SBCF vs. HCC
SBCF (Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida) and HCC (Warrior Met Coal, Inc.) are both stocks. SBCF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while HCC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, SBCF returned 5.30%/yr vs 36.36%/yr for HCC. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SBCF vs. HCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBCF achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than HCC's -9.77% return.
SBCF
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.98%
HCC
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -10.91%
- YTD
- -9.77%
- 1Y
- 54.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 36.36%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.38M | $54.26M | $71.70M | |
| $39.26M | $35.84M | $31.53M |
SBCF vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBCF Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida | 11.93% | 17.11% | -0.48% | -5.97% | -10.10% | 21.59% | -3.66% | 17.49% | 3.21% | 7.28% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | -9.77% | 63.49% | -9.79% | 81.59% | 41.03% | 21.82% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 23.20% | 131.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBCF and HCC is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SBCF and HCC has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SBCF:
$3.38B
HCC:
$4.19B
SBCF:
$0.93
HCC:
$2.61
SBCF:
37.52
HCC:
30.43
SBCF:
5.60
HCC:
2.85
SBCF:
$474.15M
HCC:
$1.47B
SBCF:
$285.70M
HCC:
$887.07M
SBCF:
$45.70M
HCC:
$296.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBCF vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank
SBCF
HCC
SBCF vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBCF | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.88 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 4.20 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBCF vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBCF drawdown since its inception was -96.16%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBCF and HCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBCF | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.16% | -64.81% | -31.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -29.51% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.82% | -45.53% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.54% | -45.53% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.92% | -27.99% | -44.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.04% | -18.19% | -31.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.25% | 13.17% | -5.92% |
Volatility
SBCF vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) is 6.66%, while Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that SBCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBCF | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 9.55% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 36.22% | -18.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.52% | 53.05% | -26.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.24% | 49.24% | -15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.76% | 52.34% | -15.58% |
Dividends
SBCF vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison
SBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than HCC's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 0.40% | 0.36% | 1.51% | 1.90% | 4.45% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 21.85% | 27.91% | 45.17% |
SBCF Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida | 2.16% | 2.32% | 2.62% | 2.49% | 2.05% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SBCF vs. HCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBCF vs. HCC - Profitability Comparison
SBCF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida reported a gross profit of -145.81M and revenue of -220.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.0%.
HCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 450.26M and revenue of 458.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
SBCF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida reported an operating income of -40.92M and revenue of -220.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.5%.
HCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 79.37M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
SBCF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida reported a net income of -31.90M and revenue of -220.81M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
HCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 72.34M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBCF and HCC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCC has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to SBCF (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBCF dropped -96.16% vs HCC's -64.81%.
HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBCF and HCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer