SBCF vs. MOMO
SBCF (Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida) and MOMO (Momo Inc.) are both stocks. SBCF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while MOMO operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, SBCF returned 9.49%/yr vs -4.09%/yr for MOMO. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SBCF vs. MOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBCF achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than MOMO's -4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SBCF has outperformed MOMO with an annualized return of 9.49%, while MOMO has yielded a comparatively lower -4.09% annualized return.
SBCF
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.98%
MOMO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- -21.76%
- 3Y*
- -11.88%
- 5Y*
- -6.18%
- 10Y*
- -4.09%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
MOMO Momo Inc. | $2.78M | $3.16M | $3.94M |
| $39.26M | $35.84M | $31.53M |
SBCF vs. MOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBCF Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida | 11.93% | 17.11% | -0.48% | -5.97% | -10.10% | 21.59% | -3.66% | 17.49% | 3.21% | 14.28% |
MOMO Momo Inc. | -4.20% | -10.17% | 21.75% | -15.26% | 12.98% | -32.96% | -56.80% | 43.24% | -2.98% | 33.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBCF and MOMO is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
SBCF:
$3.38B
MOMO:
$977.40M
SBCF:
$0.93
MOMO:
CN¥4.45
SBCF:
37.52
MOMO:
9.09
SBCF:
5.60
MOMO:
0.65
SBCF:
$474.15M
MOMO:
CN¥10.22B
SBCF:
$285.70M
MOMO:
CN¥3.89B
SBCF:
$45.70M
MOMO:
CN¥1.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBCF vs. MOMO — Risk / Return Rank
SBCF
MOMO
SBCF vs. MOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) and Momo Inc. (MOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBCF | MOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.87 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | -0.71 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | -1.07 | +4.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBCF vs. MOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBCF drawdown since its inception was -96.16%, which is greater than MOMO's maximum drawdown of -90.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBCF and MOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBCF | MOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.16% | -90.31% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -33.61% | +17.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.82% | -50.73% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.54% | -65.90% | +15.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.09% | -90.31% | +34.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.92% | -81.65% | +8.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.04% | -54.77% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.25% | 22.18% | -14.93% |
Volatility
SBCF vs. MOMO - Volatility Comparison
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) and Momo Inc. (MOMO) have volatilities of 6.66% and 6.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBCF | MOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 6.95% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 20.84% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.52% | 28.07% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.24% | 61.36% | -27.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.76% | 59.04% | -22.28% |
Dividends
SBCF vs. MOMO - Dividend Comparison
SBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than MOMO's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOMO Momo Inc. | 4.67% | 4.58% | 7.00% | 10.36% | 7.13% | 7.13% | 5.44% | 1.85% |
SBCF Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida | 2.16% | 2.32% | 2.62% | 2.49% | 2.05% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SBCF vs. MOMO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Momo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SBCF vs. MOMO - Profitability Comparison
SBCF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida reported a gross profit of -145.81M and revenue of -220.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.0%.
MOMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Momo Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.07M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.
SBCF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida reported an operating income of -40.92M and revenue of -220.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.5%.
MOMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Momo Inc. reported an operating income of 295.46M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.
SBCF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida reported a net income of -31.90M and revenue of -220.81M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
MOMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Momo Inc. reported a net income of 289.29M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBCF and MOMO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOMO has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to SBCF (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBCF dropped -96.16% vs MOMO's -90.31%.
SBCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBCF and MOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer