SAWG vs. VV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SAWG (AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SAWG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AAM, while VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index. SAWG is actively managed, while VV is passively managed. Over the past year, SAWG returned 18.49% vs 23.37% for VV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAWG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.

Performance

SAWG vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWG achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 7.90% return.

SAWG

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 5.60%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 18.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VV

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 6.95%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAWG vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF	5.60%	11.30%	6.07%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	7.90%	18.11%	9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SAWG and VV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024	0.94

The correlation between SAWG and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAWG vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAWG	VV
Technology	46.2%	35.9%
Healthcare	14.4%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	9.8%
Financial Services	8.6%	11.8%
Communication Services	8.4%	11.2%
Industrials	7.4%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	4.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.6%
Energy	-	3.6%
Real Estate	-	1.7%
Utilities	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

SAWG vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAWG

SAWG Risk / Return Rank: 42
SAWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SAWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SAWG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SAWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SAWG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

VV

VV Risk / Return Rank: 57
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAWG vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAWG	VV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.86	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.54	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.33	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	2.55	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.75	11.23	-4.48

SAWG vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAWG and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAWG vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWG drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWG and VV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAWG	VV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.68%	-54.81%	+36.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-9.21%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-3.21%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.63%	-6.83%	+4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	2.09%	+0.65%

Volatility

SAWG vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) is 4.57%, while Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that SAWG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAWG	VV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	4.94%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.38%	9.93%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.92%	12.66%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.27%	17.33%	-1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.27%	18.21%	-1.94%

SAWG vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAWG vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

SAWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than VV's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SAWG AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF	0.26%	0.27%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	1.00%	1.08%	1.24%	1.41%	1.66%	1.19%	1.46%	1.81%	2.09%	1.75%	1.98%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAWG and VV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SAWG and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SAWG or VV?

VV has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to SAWG (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAWG dropped -18.68% vs VV's -54.81%.

Which ETF is better, SAWG or VV?

On 1-year performance, VV leads with 23.37% vs 18.49% for SAWG. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SAWG has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAWG or VV?

Over the 1-year period, VV has performed better with a 23.37% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAWG or VV?

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SAWG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAWG or VV?

VV has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.26% for SAWG.

What is the main difference between SAWG and VV?

SAWG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: AAM and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SAWG and 0.04% for VV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.