PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAWG vs. SGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAWG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAWG achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 25.07% return.


SAWG

1D
0.52%
1M
0.10%
6M
8.55%
YTD
8.37%
1Y
17.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.12%

SGRT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-7.04%
6M
20.49%
YTD
25.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.88K$32.12K$31.74K
$998.46K$1.36M$2.23M

SAWG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SAWG and SGRT is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAWG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAWG
SAWG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SAWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SAWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAWG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAWG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAWGSGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

SAWG vs. SGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAWG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAWG drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAWG and SGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAWGSGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-24.98%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-18.61%

+17.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-4.25%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

Volatility

SAWG vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAWGSGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

38.93%

-25.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

38.93%

-22.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

38.93%

-22.88%

SAWG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAWG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

SAWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than SGRT's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SAWG
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Large Cap Quality Growth ETF
0.25%0.27%0.16%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth ETF
0.13%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAWG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SAWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SAWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

SAWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.13% for SGRT.

SAWG is categorized as Quality Factor, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SAWG and 0.59% for SGRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAWG and SGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer