SAUM.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SAUM.L (iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAUM.L returned 10.39%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for CMU.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SAUM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SAUM.L is traded in GBP, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return.

SAUM.L

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.64%
• YTD: 7.86%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 20.35%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	7.86%	28.60%	4.78%	17.25%	-7.39%	14.31%	6.03%	18.94%	-3.56%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.89%	25.71%	1.42%	14.39%	-5.30%	13.03%	4.59%	19.05%	-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SAUM.L and CMU.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018	0.95

The correlation between SAUM.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAUM.L	CMU.L
Financial Services	26.6%	21.8%
Technology	17.7%	30.8%
Industrials	17.1%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	10.1%
Utilities	6.5%	5.8%
Healthcare	5.6%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	5.2%
Communication Services	4.1%	2.3%
Energy	3.9%	0.0%
Basic Materials	3.7%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.3%

Return for Risk

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUM.L

SAUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SAUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SAUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SAUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SAUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAUM.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.98	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.79	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.58	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	9.67	-3.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUM.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAUM.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.98	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.66	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.49	+0.09

Drawdowns

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAUM.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-32.53%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-11.43%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.45%	-11.95%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.52%	-21.11%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.18%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-5.80%	+0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	3.05%	+0.07%

Volatility

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) is 4.37%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that SAUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAUM.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	5.34%	-0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	12.44%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.82%	14.86%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	16.00%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.01%	16.78%	+2.23%

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SAUM.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SAUM.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAUM.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SAUM.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SAUM.L or CMU.L?

On fees, SAUM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAUM.L or CMU.L?

SAUM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.

What is the main difference between SAUM.L and CMU.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SAUM.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.