SAUM.L vs. SWPPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SAUM.L (iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and SWPPX (Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund) are both funds - SAUM.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while SWPPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAUM.L returned 10.39%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for SWPPX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SAUM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SWPPX.

Performance

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SAUM.L is traded in GBP, while SWPPX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SWPPX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.28% return.

SAUM.L

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.64%
• YTD: 7.86%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 20.35%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —

SWPPX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 11.28%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 29.21%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 15.11%
• 10Y*: 16.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	7.86%	28.60%	4.78%	17.25%	-7.39%	14.31%	6.03%	18.94%	-3.56%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	11.28%	9.47%	27.15%	19.95%	-8.40%	29.89%	14.91%	26.45%	-6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SAUM.L and SWPPX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018	0.42

The correlation between SAUM.L and SWPPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAUM.L	SWPPX
Financial Services	26.6%	11.8%
Technology	17.7%	35.6%
Industrials	17.1%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	10.1%
Utilities	6.5%	2.4%
Healthcare	5.6%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	4.9%
Communication Services	4.1%	11.2%
Energy	3.9%	3.5%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAUM.L

SAUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SAUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SAUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SAUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SAUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

SWPPX

SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 65
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAUM.L	SWPPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.52	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.28	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.47	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	3.83	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	14.74	-8.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAUM.L and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAUM.L	SWPPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	2.52	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.96	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.70	-0.12

Drawdowns

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and SWPPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAUM.L	SWPPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-34.59%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-7.59%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.45%	-21.90%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.52%	-21.90%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.41%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-4.75%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	1.97%	+1.15%

Volatility

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 2.63%. This indicates that SAUM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAUM.L	SWPPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	2.63%	+1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	8.18%	+3.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.82%	11.53%	+2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	15.90%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.01%	18.34%	+0.67%

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SAUM.L vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

SAUM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWPPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund	1.00%	1.11%	1.23%	1.43%	1.67%	1.27%	1.81%	1.95%	2.67%	1.79%	2.55%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAUM.L and SWPPX in my portfolio?

SAUM.L and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.