PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CMU.L vs. 500U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CMU.L vs. 500U.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CMU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L returned 10.79%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for 500U.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMU.L is traded in GBp, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than 500U.L's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L has underperformed 500U.L with an annualized return of 10.79%, while 500U.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%

500U.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.46%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.45%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
16.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc		10.86%9.90%26.63%20.51%-9.65%31.37%13.61%27.86%-0.37%11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CMU.L and 500U.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011

0.41

Over the past year, CMU.L and 500U.L have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CMU.L
500U.L

Technology

30.8%
35.6%

Financial Services

21.8%
11.8%

Industrials

15.7%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Utilities

5.8%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.5%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.3%
11.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.9%

Energy

0.0%
3.5%

Technology

CMU.L
30.8%
500U.L
35.6%

Financial Services

CMU.L
21.8%
500U.L
11.8%

Industrials

CMU.L
15.7%
500U.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CMU.L
10.1%
500U.L
10.1%

Utilities

CMU.L
5.8%
500U.L
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

CMU.L
5.2%
500U.L
4.9%

Healthcare

CMU.L
4.2%
500U.L
8.5%

Basic Materials

CMU.L
2.8%
500U.L
1.8%

Communication Services

CMU.L
2.3%
500U.L
11.2%

Real Estate

CMU.L
1.3%
500U.L
1.9%

Energy

CMU.L
0.0%
500U.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select

Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc

Often compared with CMU.L:
CMU.L vs. CEUR.LCMU.L vs. GLDCMU.L vs. UB06.LCMU.L vs. FLXD.LCMU.L vs. 100D.LCMU.L vs. 500G.LCMU.L vs. BNKE.L
Often compared with 500U.L:
500U.L vs. VOO500U.L vs. SPY500U.L vs. ALV.DE500U.L vs. 500P.L500U.L vs. 500D.L500U.L vs. GOOG500U.L vs. VSGX

Return for Risk

CMU.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CMU.L500U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.98
2.45

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.79
3.33

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.04

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

13.57

-3.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the 500U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU.L and 500U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CMU.L500U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.45

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.00

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

1.17

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

1.33

-0.85

Drawdowns

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than 500U.L's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and 500U.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CMU.L500U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-26.14%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-7.19%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

-20.95%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-20.95%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.41%

-26.14%

-5.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.22%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-3.62%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.15%

+0.90%

Volatility

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.59%. This indicates that CMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CMU.L500U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

3.59%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

8.66%

+3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

11.86%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

15.26%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

18.56%

-1.78%

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CMU.L and 500U.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CMU.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMU.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

CMU.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L and 500U.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

CMU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMU.L and 500U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer