CMU.L vs. FLXD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) and FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMU.L returned 10.45%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for FLXD.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXD.L.

Performance

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CMU.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than FLXD.L's 8.75% return.

CMU.L

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 7.55%
• YTD: 15.52%
• 6M: 17.22%
• 1Y: 29.93%
• 3Y*: 15.83%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 10.86%

FLXD.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 8.75%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 19.04%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.52%	25.71%	1.42%	14.39%	-5.30%	13.03%	4.59%	19.05%	-11.56%	0.62%
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	8.75%	31.50%	8.51%	9.23%	6.26%	10.54%	1.48%	13.79%	-11.21%	-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CMU.L and FLXD.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between CMU.L and FLXD.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CMU.L	FLXD.L
Technology	30.8%	0.7%
Financial Services	21.8%	35.8%
Industrials	15.7%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	1.0%
Utilities	5.8%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.6%
Healthcare	4.2%	10.3%
Basic Materials	2.8%	5.2%
Communication Services	2.3%	16.3%
Real Estate	1.3%	3.5%
Energy	0.0%	11.6%

Return for Risk

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FLXD.L

FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMU.L	FLXD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.37	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.47	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.43	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	5.58	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.79	15.69	-5.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMU.L	FLXD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	2.37	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	1.20	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.63	-0.15

Drawdowns

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than FLXD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and FLXD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMU.L	FLXD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.53%	-29.71%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-3.62%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.95%	-7.78%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.11%	-11.76%	-9.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-3.24%	+2.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.80%	-4.13%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	1.29%	+1.76%

Volatility

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that CMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMU.L	FLXD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	2.68%	+2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.44%	6.94%	+5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	8.54%	+6.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	10.85%	+5.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.78%	12.92%	+3.86%

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CMU.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	4.39%	4.90%	5.18%	5.75%	5.87%	5.51%	3.90%	1.53%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMU.L and FLXD.L in my portfolio?

CMU.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMU.L or FLXD.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMU.L or FLXD.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXD.L.

What is the main difference between CMU.L and FLXD.L?

CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.