SAUM.L vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
SAUM.L and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SAUM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Oct 19, 2018. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both SAUM.L and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SAUM.L or QQQM.
Correlation
The correlation between SAUM.L and QQQM is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SAUM.L vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SAUM.L:
0.87
QQQM:
1.31
SAUM.L:
1.29
QQQM:
1.79
SAUM.L:
1.15
QQQM:
1.24
SAUM.L:
1.16
QQQM:
1.77
SAUM.L:
2.46
QQQM:
6.11
SAUM.L:
4.43%
QQQM:
3.92%
SAUM.L:
12.51%
QQQM:
18.29%
SAUM.L:
-31.05%
QQQM:
-35.05%
SAUM.L:
-1.39%
QQQM:
-2.47%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAUM.L achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 2.93% return.
SAUM.L
10.23%
2.64%
8.06%
11.00%
8.62%
N/A
QQQM
2.93%
-1.01%
9.98%
20.88%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAUM.L vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAUM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SAUM.L vs. QQQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SAUM.L
QQQM
SAUM.L vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SAUM.L vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
SAUM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAUM.L iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.59% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
SAUM.L vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAUM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAUM.L and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SAUM.L vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SAUM.L) is 4.42%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that SAUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.