SATO vs. GFOF
SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GFOF.
Performance
SATO vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SATO
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 46.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SATO vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 6.41% | 2.26% | 55.25% | 266.77% | -75.17% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.08% | 145.49% | -68.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATO and GFOF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SATO and GFOF shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SATO vs. GFOF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SATO
GFOF
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
SATO
GFOF
Technology
SATO
GFOF
Consumer Cyclical
SATO
GFOF
-
Communication Services
SATO
GFOF
-
Industrials
SATO
GFOF
Utilities
SATO
GFOF
-
Healthcare
SATO
GFOF
Basic Materials
SATO
-
GFOF
-
Consumer Defensive
SATO
-
GFOF
-
Energy
SATO
-
GFOF
-
Real Estate
SATO
-
GFOF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATO vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank
SATO
GFOF
SATO vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATO | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATO | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SATO vs. GFOF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATO | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.80% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | — | — |
Volatility
SATO vs. GFOF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATO | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.47% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.29% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.29% | — | — |
SATO vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SATO vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison
SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, while GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF | 7.41% | 9.50% | 15.03% | 2.21% | 8.97% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SATO and GFOF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.
SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GFOF is Blockchain. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.70% for GFOF.
Find the right allocation for SATO and GFOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer