SATO vs. GFOF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SATO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GFOF.

Performance

SATO vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SATO

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: -5.06%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 37.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	0.09%	2.26%	55.25%	266.77%	-76.37%
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	60.08%	145.49%	-69.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and GFOF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022	0.78

The correlation between SATO and GFOF shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SATO vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO

SATO Risk / Return Rank: 11
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 10

GFOF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SATO	GFOF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SATO	GFOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.67%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.82%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SATO	GFOF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.11%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.17%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.17%	—	—

SATO vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SATO vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, while GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%	0.00%	0.00%
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	6.70%	9.50%	15.03%	2.21%	8.97%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SATO and GFOF in my portfolio?

SATO and GFOF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SATO or GFOF?

On fees, SATO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SATO or GFOF?

SATO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SATO or GFOF?

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.

What is the main difference between SATO and GFOF?

SATO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GFOF is Blockchain. SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.70% for GFOF.