SATO vs. EZPZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SATO (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SATO tracks the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SATO returned -22.30% vs -48.19% for EZPZ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SATO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.

Performance

SATO vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATO achieves a -11.75% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -31.61% return.

SATO

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: -10.88%
• 6M: -23.63%
• YTD: -11.75%
• 1Y: -22.30%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZPZ

• 1D: -2.50%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: -35.13%
• YTD: -31.61%
• 1Y: -48.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATO vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	-11.75%	-2.50%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-31.61%	-10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SATO and EZPZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.79

The correlation between SATO and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SATO vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATO

SATO Risk / Return Rank: 6
SATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SATO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SATO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATO vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SATO	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	-1.01	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	-1.54	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.83	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	-0.85	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	-1.38	+0.68

SATO vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATO Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is higher than the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATO and EZPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SATO vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATO drawdown since its inception was -88.00%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATO and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SATO	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.00%	-56.63%	-31.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.49%	-56.63%	+3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.92%	-53.89%	+7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.75%	-24.05%	-26.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.01%	35.01%	-3.00%

Volatility

SATO vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) have volatilities of 12.67% and 12.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SATO	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.67%	12.32%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.10%	37.10%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.01%	47.76%	+4.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.99%	47.54%	+15.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.99%	47.54%	+15.45%

SATO vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SATO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SATO vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

SATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF	7.60%	9.50%	15.03%	2.21%	8.97%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SATO and EZPZ in my portfolio?

SATO and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SATO or EZPZ?

SATO has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to EZPZ (12.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATO dropped -88.00% vs EZPZ's -56.63%.

Which ETF is better, SATO or EZPZ?

On 1-year performance, SATO leads with -22.30% vs -48.19% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 12.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SATO or EZPZ?

Over the 1-year period, SATO has performed better with a -22.30% return vs -48.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SATO or EZPZ?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SATO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SATO or EZPZ?

SATO has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between SATO and EZPZ?

SATO tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SATO and 0.19% for EZPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.