SASS vs. POW

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

SASS (M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

SASS vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SASS

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: -4.96%
• 6M: 39.30%
• YTD: 42.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SASS vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SASS M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF	-1.59%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SASS and POW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

SASS vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SASS vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SASS drawdown since its inception was -9.61%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASS and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SASS	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-17.41%	+7.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-16.37%	+13.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-4.18%	+0.67%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SASS	POW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	32.79%	-15.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	32.79%	-15.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	32.79%	-15.26%

SASS vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SASS and POW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

SASS vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

SASS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.13%	0.19%
SASS M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SASS and POW in my portfolio?

SASS and POW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SASS or POW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SASS or POW?

SASS and POW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SASS or POW?

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for SASS.

What is the main difference between SASS and POW?

They also come from different issuers: M.D. Sass and VistaShares.