PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAP vs. CW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAP vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SAP SE (SAP) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAP achieves a -31.24% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 37.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SAP has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 9.59%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 25.12% annualized return.


SAP

1D
0.33%
1M
2.09%
YTD
-31.24%
6M
-31.78%
1Y
-44.64%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
9.59%

CW

1D
0.10%
1M
0.93%
YTD
37.55%
6M
38.99%
1Y
60.13%
3Y*
63.08%
5Y*
43.15%
10Y*
25.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAP vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAP
SAP SE
-31.24%-0.48%61.27%52.30%-24.64%9.22%-1.28%36.43%-10.04%31.25%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
37.55%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%-16.83%38.70%-15.79%24.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SAP and CW is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 1998

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between SAP and CW has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAP:

$191.76B

CW:

$28.09B

EPS

SAP:

€6.13

CW:

$13.64

PE Ratio

SAP:

23.16

CW:

55.58

PEG Ratio

SAP:

0.49

CW:

3.03

PS Ratio

SAP:

4.46

CW:

7.88

PB Ratio

SAP:

3.70

CW:

10.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAP:

€37.34B

CW:

$3.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAP:

€27.51B

CW:

$1.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAP:

€12.97B

CW:

$745.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAP vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAP
SAP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAP Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAP vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SAP SE (SAP) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAPCWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.31

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

4.66

-5.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.58

13.53

-15.11

SAP vs. CW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the CW Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAP and CW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAP vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAP drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAP and CW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAPCWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.91%

-59.19%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.71%

-12.97%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.71%

-27.21%

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.71%

-27.21%

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.31%

-48.73%

-2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.45%

0.00%

-46.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-13.89%

-14.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.29%

4.46%

+23.83%

Volatility

SAP vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

SAP SE (SAP) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 10.40%. This indicates that SAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAPCWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.54%

10.40%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.61%

26.00%

+4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.27%

32.95%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

27.89%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.37%

30.31%

-1.94%

Dividends

SAP vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

SAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than CW's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.13%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%
SAP
SAP SE
1.78%1.05%0.97%1.41%2.05%1.56%1.31%1.27%1.73%0.87%1.08%1.11%

Financials

SAP vs. CW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SAP SE and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
9.56B
913.69M
(SAP) Total Revenue
(CW) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SAP values in EUR, CW values in USD

SAP vs. CW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SAP SE and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
73.0%
36.3%
Portfolio components
SAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a gross profit of 6.97B and revenue of 9.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

SAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported an operating income of 2.75B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

SAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a net income of 1.93B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAP and CW have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAP has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to CW (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAP dropped -87.91% vs CW's -59.19%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAP and CW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer