PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAP vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAP vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SAP SE (SAP) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAP achieves a -20.08% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SAP has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 10.53%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.43% annualized return.


SAP

1D
-2.70%
1M
13.69%
YTD
-20.08%
6M
-19.69%
1Y
-36.28%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
10.53%

MSFT

1D
-4.17%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-8.34%
6M
-9.54%
1Y
-3.71%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
25.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAP vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAP
SAP SE
-20.08%-0.48%61.27%52.30%-24.64%9.22%-1.28%36.43%-10.04%31.25%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-8.34%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SAP and MSFT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 1998

0.47

The correlation between SAP and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAP:

$222.88B

MSFT:

$3.29T

EPS

SAP:

$6.13

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

SAP:

31.15

MSFT:

26.28

PEG Ratio

SAP:

0.66

MSFT:

1.84

PS Ratio

SAP:

6.00

MSFT:

10.34

PB Ratio

SAP:

4.97

MSFT:

7.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAP:

$37.34B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAP:

$27.51B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAP:

$12.97B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAP vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAP
SAP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAP vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SAP SE (SAP) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAPMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.10

-0.15

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.49

-0.04

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.00

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.10

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-0.21

-1.10

SAP vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAP and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAPMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

-0.15

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.50

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.94

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.75

-0.60

Drawdowns

SAP vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAP drawdown since its inception was -87.91%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAP and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAPMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.91%

-69.38%

-18.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.71%

-33.91%

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.71%

-33.91%

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.71%

-37.15%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.31%

-37.15%

-14.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.76%

-18.07%

-19.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.23%

-21.78%

-6.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.28%

15.90%

+11.38%

Volatility

SAP vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

SAP SE (SAP) has a higher volatility of 11.84% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.31%. This indicates that SAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAPMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.84%

9.31%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.34%

22.14%

+7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.16%

24.92%

+8.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.50%

26.59%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.25%

27.03%

+1.22%

Dividends

SAP vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

SAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than MSFT's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.81%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
SAP
SAP SE
1.53%1.05%0.97%1.41%2.05%1.56%1.31%1.27%1.73%0.87%1.08%1.11%

Financials

SAP vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SAP SE and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
9.56B
82.89B
(SAP) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAP vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SAP SE and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

66.0%68.0%70.0%72.0%74.0%20222023202420252026
73.0%
67.6%
Portfolio components
SAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a gross profit of 6.97B and revenue of 9.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

SAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported an operating income of 2.75B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

SAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a net income of 1.93B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAP and MSFT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAP has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to MSFT (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAP dropped -87.91% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAP and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer