PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMIX vs. BRUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMIX achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than BRUFX's 16.02% return.


SAMIX

1D
1.22%
1M
-2.12%
6M
2.21%
YTD
3.57%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.08%

BRUFX

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.09%
6M
11.25%
YTD
16.02%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
7.56%
ALL TIME*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
3.57%12.60%11.53%13.68%-10.56%14.08%9.36%17.88%-7.54%0.00%
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
16.02%14.89%4.45%-0.74%-8.80%17.35%12.06%22.42%-3.99%-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMIX and BRUFX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.68

The correlation between SAMIX and BRUFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMIX vs. BRUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAMIX
SAMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SAMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BRUFX
BRUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BRUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMIXBRUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.49

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.78

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

17.01

-12.47

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the BRUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMIX and BRUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum BRUFX drawdown of -44.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMIX and BRUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMIXBRUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-44.50%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-7.67%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-9.66%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.54%

-17.91%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-1.71%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-9.04%

+5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.70%

+0.15%

Volatility

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Bruce Fund (BRUFX) at 2.42%. This indicates that SAMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMIXBRUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.42%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

8.50%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

10.65%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.24%

10.58%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

11.65%

+1.01%

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BRUFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMIX vs. BRUFX - Dividend Comparison

SAMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, more than BRUFX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
5.48%6.35%5.01%6.46%13.31%9.25%5.83%2.03%2.49%4.11%6.26%4.63%
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.90%10.26%3.60%2.78%5.82%8.13%1.66%2.44%3.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMIX and BRUFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAMIX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to BRUFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMIX dropped -26.06% vs BRUFX's -44.50%.

BRUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMIX and BRUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer