PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRUFX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bruce Fund (BRUFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRUFX achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BRUFX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 7.50%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.63% annualized return.


BRUFX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.26%
YTD
10.58%
6M
10.20%
1Y
23.61%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
7.50%

VTMFX

1D
0.57%
1M
0.96%
YTD
5.44%
6M
5.27%
1Y
15.82%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
10.58%14.89%4.45%-0.74%-8.80%17.35%12.06%22.42%-3.99%12.48%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
5.44%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BRUFX and VTMFX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 1994

0.54

The correlation between BRUFX and VTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRUFX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRUFX
BRUFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BRUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bruce Fund (BRUFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRUFXVTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.47

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.93

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.74

13.72

+0.02

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRUFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRUFX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRUFX drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRUFX and VTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRUFXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.50%

-28.49%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-5.38%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.66%

-10.61%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-17.40%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.44%

-21.87%

-3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.56%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-3.54%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.15%

+0.58%

Volatility

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Bruce Fund (BRUFX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.50%. This indicates that BRUFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRUFXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.50%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

5.21%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

6.45%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.52%

8.57%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.61%

9.15%

+2.46%

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRUFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRUFX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

BRUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than VTMFX's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRUFX
Bruce Fund
5.75%6.35%5.01%6.46%13.31%9.25%5.83%2.03%2.49%4.11%6.26%4.63%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.12%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRUFX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRUFX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to VTMFX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRUFX dropped -44.50% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRUFX and VTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer