SAMBX vs. BGT
SAMBX (Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund) and BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, SAMBX returned 4.54%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for BGT. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SAMBX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for BGT.
Performance
SAMBX vs. BGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAMBX achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than BGT's 3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SAMBX has underperformed BGT with an annualized return of 4.54%, while BGT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.51% annualized return.
SAMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.30%
BGT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- -3.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.59M | $1.30M | $1.18M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SAMBX vs. BGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund | 2.76% | 5.88% | 7.03% | 11.21% | -0.86% | 4.86% | 0.41% | 6.66% | 0.24% | 3.89% |
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 3.20% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAMBX and BGT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAMBX vs. BGT — Risk / Return Rank
SAMBX
BGT
SAMBX vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAMBX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | 0.96 | +0.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.08 | -0.25 | +8.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.51 | -0.52 | +25.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAMBX vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAMBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, smaller than the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMBX and BGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAMBX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -58.06% | +33.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.78% | -11.06% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.95% | -15.91% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.66% | -23.19% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.91% | -41.90% | +20.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.09% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -8.10% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 5.41% | -5.15% |
Volatility
SAMBX vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) is 0.27%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that SAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAMBX | BGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.27% | 3.08% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 7.43% | -5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45% | 9.95% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 13.60% | -10.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 15.35% | -11.42% |
SAMBX vs. BGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAMBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BGT's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAMBX vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison
SAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, less than BGT's 13.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.33% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
SAMBX Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.76% | 7.78% | 8.21% | 8.21% | 5.34% | 3.03% | 4.03% | 5.28% | 5.15% | 4.28% | 4.79% | 4.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAMBX and BGT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGT has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to SAMBX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMBX dropped -24.74% vs BGT's -58.06%.
SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAMBX and BGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer