PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMBX vs. PONAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMBX achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than PONAX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SAMBX has outperformed PONAX with an annualized return of 4.71%, while PONAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


SAMBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
2.55%
6M
3.69%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
4.71%

PONAX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.16%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.39%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
7.30%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.55%5.88%7.03%11.21%-0.86%4.86%0.41%6.66%0.24%3.89%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
0.83%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMBX and PONAX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMBX vs. PONAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMBX
SAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMBXPONAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.15

1.35

+0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.38

2.03

+7.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.39

6.75

+22.65

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the PONAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMBX and PONAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, which is greater than PONAX's maximum drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMBX and PONAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMBXPONAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.74%

-13.64%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.78%

-3.69%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-3.90%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

-13.64%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

-13.64%

-7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.03%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-1.79%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

1.11%

-0.86%

Volatility

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund (SAMBX) is 0.69%, while PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that SAMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PONAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMBXPONAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

1.41%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

3.36%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45%

4.12%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

4.83%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

4.22%

-0.28%

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PONAX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMBX vs. PONAX - Dividend Comparison

SAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than PONAX's 5.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
5.43%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%
SAMBX
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.43%7.78%8.21%8.21%5.34%3.03%4.03%5.28%5.15%4.28%4.79%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMBX and PONAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PONAX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to SAMBX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMBX dropped -24.74% vs PONAX's -13.64%.

SAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMBX and PONAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer