SAIA vs. FNDF
SAIA (Saia, Inc.) is a stock, while FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, SAIA returned 34.25%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for FNDF. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAIA vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAIA achieves a 47.88% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIA has outperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 34.25%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.
SAIA
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 47.88%
- 6M
- 39.94%
- 1Y
- 85.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 34.25%
FNDF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
SAIA vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAIA Saia, Inc. | 47.88% | -28.35% | 4.00% | 108.99% | -37.79% | 86.41% | 94.16% | 66.82% | -21.10% | 60.25% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 19.66% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAIA and FNDF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.42 |
The correlation between SAIA and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAIA vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
SAIA
FNDF
SAIA vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saia, Inc. (SAIA) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAIA | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.82 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 14.27 | -5.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAIA vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAIA drawdown since its inception was -80.35%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIA and FNDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAIA | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.35% | -40.14% | -40.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.92% | -10.60% | -14.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.94% | -13.89% | -47.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.94% | -25.56% | -35.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.94% | -40.14% | -20.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.31% | -1.94% | -18.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.96% | -7.63% | -21.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 2.84% | +6.63% |
Volatility
SAIA vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
Saia, Inc. (SAIA) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) at 6.65%. This indicates that SAIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAIA | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 6.65% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.98% | 13.64% | +21.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.97% | 16.00% | +31.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.37% | 16.35% | +35.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.75% | 17.71% | +28.04% |
Dividends
SAIA vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
SAIA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.87% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
SAIA Saia, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAIA and FNDF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAIA has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to FNDF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAIA dropped -80.35% vs FNDF's -40.14%.
FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAIA and FNDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer