PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAFT vs. PRU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAFT vs. PRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAFT achieves a 35.82% return, which is significantly higher than PRU's 11.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SAFT having a 9.54% annualized return and PRU not far ahead at 9.96%.


SAFT

1D
0.09%
1M
37.84%
6M
37.10%
YTD
35.82%
1Y
54.48%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
13.93%

PRU

1D
0.11%
1M
13.75%
6M
14.80%
YTD
11.74%
1Y
27.17%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$218.17M$203.55M$205.53M
$56.84M$31.28M$16.42M

SAFT vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group, Inc.
35.82%-0.84%13.25%-5.36%3.14%14.08%-11.81%17.22%5.67%13.66%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
11.74%0.18%19.46%10.09%-3.86%45.32%-11.40%20.10%-26.46%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SAFT and PRU is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAFT:

$1.52B

PRU:

$42.60B

EPS

SAFT:

$4.30

PRU:

$9.88

PE Ratio

SAFT:

23.98

PRU:

12.42

PEG Ratio

SAFT:

0.50

PRU:

0.51

PS Ratio

SAFT:

1.19

PRU:

0.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAFT:

$1.27B

PRU:

$47.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAFT:

$347.54M

PRU:

$14.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAFT:

$99.08M

PRU:

$4.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAFT vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SAFT
SAFT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SAFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAFT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SAFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAFT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PRU
PRU Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRU Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SAFT vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAFTPRUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.22

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

1.27

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

2.76

+6.76

SAFT vs. PRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAFT Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the PRU Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAFT and PRU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAFT vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAFT drawdown since its inception was -44.00%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAFT and PRU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAFTPRUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.00%

-88.53%

+44.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-21.46%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

-25.66%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

-33.11%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.83%

-65.89%

+33.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.94%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-18.24%

+6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

9.87%

-4.13%

Volatility

SAFT vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison

Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) has a higher volatility of 35.23% compared to Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) at 6.27%. This indicates that SAFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAFTPRUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.23%

6.27%

+28.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.33%

17.54%

+19.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.66%

23.01%

+22.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.82%

25.61%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.04%

31.68%

-4.64%

Dividends

SAFT vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison

SAFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than PRU's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
4.48%4.78%4.39%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group, Inc.
3.57%4.67%4.37%4.74%4.27%4.23%4.62%3.67%3.91%3.73%3.80%4.97%

Financials

SAFT vs. PRU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safety Insurance Group, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SAFT and PRU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAFT has higher volatility (35.23%) compared to PRU (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAFT dropped -44.00% vs PRU's -88.53%.

SAFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAFT and PRU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer