SAFT vs. SCHD
SAFT (Safety Insurance Group, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, SAFT returned 6.17%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SAFT vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAFT achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SAFT has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 6.17%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
SAFT
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -5.93%
- 1Y
- -3.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
SAFT vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAFT Safety Insurance Group, Inc. | -4.26% | -0.84% | 13.25% | -5.36% | 3.14% | 14.08% | -11.81% | 17.22% | 5.67% | 13.66% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAFT and SCHD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SAFT and SCHD has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAFT vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
SAFT
SCHD
SAFT vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAFT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.40 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 5.35 | -5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 12.94 | -13.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAFT vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAFT drawdown since its inception was -44.00%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAFT and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAFT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.00% | -33.37% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.07% | -4.61% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.12% | -16.13% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.43% | -16.85% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.83% | -33.37% | +0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -2.47% | -9.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -3.31% | -8.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 1.90% | +5.59% |
Volatility
SAFT vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that SAFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAFT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 3.58% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 7.73% | +5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.53% | 11.07% | +8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 14.36% | +7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 16.71% | +6.88% |
Dividends
SAFT vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
SAFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAFT Safety Insurance Group, Inc. | 5.06% | 4.67% | 4.37% | 4.74% | 4.27% | 4.23% | 4.62% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 3.73% | 3.80% | 4.97% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAFT and SCHD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SAFT has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAFT dropped -44.00% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAFT and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer