SAEF vs. IMCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SAEF (Schwab Ariel ESG ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. SAEF is actively managed, while IMCB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SAEF returned 13.25%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for IMCB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SAEF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.

Performance

SAEF vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 14.72% return.

SAEF

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 23.77%
• 3Y*: 13.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMCB

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 23.24%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEF vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF	9.41%	2.31%	16.14%	17.87%	-18.29%	-2.35%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	14.72%	10.25%	15.10%	16.37%	-16.09%	-2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEF and IMCB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.93

The correlation between SAEF and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SAEF vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SAEF	IMCB
Consumer Cyclical	22.6%	9.0%
Industrials	20.3%	19.0%
Financial Services	15.0%	12.0%
Technology	14.7%	21.3%
Healthcare	10.0%	7.9%
Communication Services	7.5%	2.3%
Real Estate	4.5%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	5.1%
Basic Materials	2.3%	5.3%
Energy	-	7.4%
Utilities	-	6.2%

Return for Risk

SAEF vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAEF

SAEF Risk / Return Rank: 35
SAEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SAEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SAEF Omega Ratio Rank: 33
SAEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SAEF Martin Ratio Rank: 34

IMCB

IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 56
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEF vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAEF	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.83	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.61	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.90	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	11.50	-6.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAEF vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAEF and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAEF	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.83	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.50	-0.29

Drawdowns

SAEF vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEF drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEF and IMCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAEF	IMCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.05%	-58.80%	+30.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-8.05%	-4.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.40%	-19.80%	-7.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.15%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-0.24%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.39%	-7.73%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	2.03%	+2.70%

Volatility

SAEF vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) at 3.31%. This indicates that SAEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAEF	IMCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	3.31%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	9.58%	+4.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	12.75%	+6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.40%	17.57%	+3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.40%	19.65%	+1.75%

SAEF vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAEF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAEF vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

SAEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than IMCB's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.21%	1.42%	1.43%	1.55%	1.70%	1.08%	1.12%	1.32%	1.80%	1.31%	1.79%	1.47%
SAEF Schwab Ariel ESG ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.46%	0.46%	0.61%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAEF and IMCB in my portfolio?

SAEF and IMCB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAEF or IMCB?

SAEF has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to IMCB (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAEF dropped -28.05% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, SAEF or IMCB?

On 3-year performance, IMCB leads with 17.84% vs 13.25% for SAEF. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SAEF or IMCB?

Over the 3-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SAEF or IMCB?

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SAEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SAEF or IMCB?

IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.34% for SAEF.

What is the main difference between SAEF and IMCB?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SAEF and 0.04% for IMCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.