SACH vs. LFT
SACH (Sachem Capital Corp.) and LFT (Lument Finance Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, SACH returned -8.36%/yr vs -15.79%/yr for LFT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SACH vs. LFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SACH achieves a 81.93% return, which is significantly higher than LFT's -26.79% return.
SACH
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 49.20%
- YTD
- 81.93%
- 6M
- 81.93%
- 1Y
- 86.96%
- 3Y*
- -7.13%
- 5Y*
- -8.36%
- 10Y*
- —
LFT
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -12.28%
- YTD
- -26.79%
- 6M
- -27.77%
- 1Y
- -54.81%
- 3Y*
- -8.68%
- 5Y*
- -15.79%
- 10Y*
- -3.37%
SACH vs. LFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACH Sachem Capital Corp. | 81.93% | -9.17% | -60.54% | 29.48% | -35.83% | 52.67% | 7.94% | 19.39% | 15.66% | -14.69% |
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | -26.79% | -39.33% | 29.40% | 38.64% | -45.07% | 28.63% | 15.69% | 23.31% | -22.06% | -14.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SACH and LFT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
SACH:
$43.40M
LFT:
$52.40M
SACH:
-$0.04
LFT:
-$0.06
SACH:
1.29
LFT:
0.92
SACH:
0.26
LFT:
0.33
SACH:
$33.56M
LFT:
$56.81M
SACH:
$32.83M
LFT:
$63.50M
SACH:
$18.86M
LFT:
$37.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SACH vs. LFT — Risk / Return Rank
SACH
LFT
SACH vs. LFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) and Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SACH | LFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.78 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | -1.00 | +4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | -1.57 | +8.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SACH vs. LFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SACH drawdown since its inception was -80.30%, roughly equal to the maximum LFT drawdown of -81.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACH and LFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SACH | LFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.30% | -81.57% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.54% | -55.07% | +27.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.73% | -59.51% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.30% | -59.51% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.25% | -61.22% | +10.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.78% | -33.00% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.59% | 34.92% | -22.33% |
Volatility
SACH vs. LFT - Volatility Comparison
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) has a higher volatility of 67.91% compared to Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) at 13.71%. This indicates that SACH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SACH | LFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 67.91% | 13.71% | +54.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.52% | 33.38% | +43.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.68% | 47.45% | +57.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.04% | 35.31% | +25.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.09% | 41.48% | +16.61% |
Dividends
SACH vs. LFT - Dividend Comparison
SACH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.74%, more than LFT's 18.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | 18.00% | 15.60% | 15.50% | 11.16% | 12.63% | 9.38% | 11.16% | 9.13% | 9.79% | 13.75% | 41.20% | 24.73% |
SACH Sachem Capital Corp. | 71.74% | 19.23% | 17.78% | 12.83% | 15.76% | 8.22% | 11.54% | 8.29% | 15.60% | 6.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SACH vs. LFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sachem Capital Corp. and Lument Finance Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SACH and LFT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SACH has higher volatility (67.91%) compared to LFT (13.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACH dropped -80.30% vs LFT's -81.57%.
SACH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SACH and LFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer