PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SACH vs. PSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SACH vs. PSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SACH achieves a 20.93% return, which is significantly higher than PSEC's 1.34% return.


SACH

1D
-4.00%
1M
16.50%
YTD
20.93%
6M
26.43%
1Y
44.21%
3Y*
-17.53%
5Y*
-15.12%
10Y*

PSEC

1D
-1.63%
1M
-12.56%
YTD
1.34%
6M
2.01%
1Y
-8.85%
3Y*
-15.46%
5Y*
-12.62%
10Y*
0.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SACH vs. PSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
20.93%-9.17%-60.54%29.48%-35.83%52.67%7.94%19.39%15.66%-17.06%
PSEC
Prospect Capital Corporation
1.34%-28.86%-18.16%-4.13%-8.61%70.00%-3.54%13.83%4.09%-17.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SACH and PSEC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2017

0.23

The correlation between SACH and PSEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SACH:

-$0.04

PSEC:

-$0.28

PS Ratio

SACH:

1.68

PSEC:

5.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

SACH:

$33.56M

PSEC:

$151.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SACH:

$32.83M

PSEC:

-$59.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

SACH:

$18.86M

PSEC:

-$94.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SACH vs. PSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SACH
SACH Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SACH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SACH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SACH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SACH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SACH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PSEC
PSEC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SACH vs. PSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SACHPSECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

-0.27

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

-0.17

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.98

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

-0.40

+2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

-0.74

+4.47

SACH vs. PSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SACH Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the PSEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SACH and PSEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SACHPSECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

-0.27

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

-0.45

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.09

-0.17

Drawdowns

SACH vs. PSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SACH drawdown since its inception was -80.30%, which is greater than PSEC's maximum drawdown of -61.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACH and PSEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SACHPSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.30%

-61.51%

-18.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.52%

-27.04%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.73%

-50.64%

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.30%

-57.21%

-23.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.93%

-51.10%

-15.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.62%

-15.59%

-14.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.93%

14.51%

-2.58%

Volatility

SACH vs. PSEC - Volatility Comparison

Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) has a higher volatility of 37.47% compared to Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC) at 14.46%. This indicates that SACH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SACHPSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.47%

14.46%

+23.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.37%

26.50%

+15.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.38%

33.21%

+26.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.55%

27.94%

+18.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.53%

27.28%

+23.25%

Dividends

SACH vs. PSEC - Dividend Comparison

SACH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.67%, less than PSEC's 21.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSEC
Prospect Capital Corporation
21.90%20.85%16.01%12.02%10.30%8.56%13.31%11.18%11.41%13.45%11.98%14.72%
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
16.67%19.23%17.78%12.83%15.76%8.22%11.54%8.29%15.60%6.60%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SACH vs. PSEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sachem Capital Corp. and Prospect Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M202220232024202520260
123.07M
(SACH) Total Revenue
(PSEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SACH and PSEC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SACH has higher volatility (37.47%) compared to PSEC (14.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACH dropped -80.30% vs PSEC's -61.51%.

SACH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SACH and PSEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer