PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SACAX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SACAX achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than PTDIX's 7.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SACAX has outperformed PTDIX with an annualized return of 12.31%, while PTDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.60% annualized return.


SACAX

1D
1.18%
1M
1.98%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.70%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
12.31%

PTDIX

1D
1.02%
1M
1.53%
YTD
7.32%
6M
7.72%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SACAX
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio
11.27%16.56%24.20%21.42%-19.06%19.34%15.11%26.87%-9.13%21.68%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.32%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SACAX and PTDIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2001

0.99

The correlation between SACAX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SACAX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SACAX
SACAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SACAXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.52

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

10.99

+1.28

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SACAX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SACAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, roughly equal to the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACAX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SACAXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.31%

-54.38%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-7.32%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-13.05%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-25.43%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

-30.02%

-4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.45%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-7.48%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.68%

+0.33%

Volatility

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) at 4.05%. This indicates that SACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SACAXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.05%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

8.56%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

10.36%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

13.58%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

13.86%

+2.23%

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SACAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

SACAX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

SACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than PTDIX's 9.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.13%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%
SACAX
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio
10.78%11.99%13.37%1.16%9.30%7.53%4.02%4.47%20.79%6.82%3.68%14.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SACAX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SACAX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to PTDIX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACAX dropped -54.31% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

SACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SACAX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer