PTDIX vs. JRLVX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PTDIX (Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund) and JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PTDIX returned 10.47%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for JRLVX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.01% expense ratio.

Performance

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTDIX achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PTDIX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 10.47%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.

PTDIX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 18.65%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: 10.47%

JRLVX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 12.35%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTDIX Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund	7.44%	15.59%	17.43%	18.33%	-18.13%	15.35%	16.04%	24.91%	-7.95%	20.69%
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	11.90%	19.25%	14.50%	18.00%	-18.06%	18.45%	16.23%	25.03%	-8.29%	17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PTDIX and JRLVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013	0.98

The correlation between PTDIX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PTDIX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTDIX

PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

JRLVX

JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 71
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTDIX	JRLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.39	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.31	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.44	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.17	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	14.06	-2.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTDIX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTDIX	JRLVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.39	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.63	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.71	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.65	-0.17

Drawdowns

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTDIX drawdown since its inception was -54.38%, which is greater than JRLVX's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTDIX and JRLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTDIX	JRLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.38%	-32.53%	-21.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.32%	-8.50%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.05%	-15.27%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.43%	-25.64%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.02%	-32.53%	+2.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.38%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-4.56%	-2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	1.91%	-0.27%

Volatility

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) is 2.92%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that PTDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTDIX	JRLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	3.33%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.87%	8.98%	-1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.84%	11.29%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.49%	14.77%	-1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.83%	15.98%	-2.15%

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTDIX and JRLVX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PTDIX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

PTDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	3.18%	3.55%	1.89%	2.24%	8.03%	6.00%	4.26%	8.99%	10.96%	4.29%	3.40%	1.90%
PTDIX Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund	9.12%	9.80%	12.28%	4.40%	8.61%	8.92%	6.01%	7.26%	9.28%	6.07%	4.86%	6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTDIX and JRLVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, PTDIX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PTDIX or JRLVX?

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PTDIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTDIX dropped -54.38% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.