PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SACAX vs. PPVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal SmallCap Value Fund II (PPVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SACAX having a 11.70% return and PPVIX slightly higher at 11.72%. Over the past 10 years, SACAX has outperformed PPVIX with an annualized return of 12.25%, while PPVIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.


SACAX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.86%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.35%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
12.25%

PPVIX

1D
1.11%
1M
0.63%
YTD
11.72%
6M
10.83%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SACAX
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio
11.70%16.56%24.20%21.42%-19.06%19.34%15.11%26.87%-9.13%21.68%
PPVIX
Principal SmallCap Value Fund II
11.72%8.18%16.09%20.00%-9.20%32.00%3.61%23.19%-14.74%6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SACAX and PPVIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2004

0.87

The correlation between SACAX and PPVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SACAX vs. PPVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SACAX
SACAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PPVIX
PPVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PPVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal SmallCap Value Fund II (PPVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SACAXPPVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.34

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.46

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

11.90

+1.16

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the PPVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SACAX and PPVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SACAXPPVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.92

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.45

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.48

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.39

+0.09

Drawdowns

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SACAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, smaller than the maximum PPVIX drawdown of -64.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACAX and PPVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SACAXPPVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.31%

-64.79%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-9.21%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-22.89%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.96%

-22.89%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

-45.87%

+10.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-9.69%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.67%

-0.70%

Volatility

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) is 3.34%, while Principal SmallCap Value Fund II (PPVIX) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that SACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SACAXPPVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.88%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

10.84%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

16.63%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

21.13%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

22.64%

-6.59%

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SACAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than PPVIX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

SACAX vs. PPVIX - Dividend Comparison

SACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than PPVIX's 7.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPVIX
Principal SmallCap Value Fund II
7.95%8.88%20.81%3.11%11.81%15.05%0.76%0.88%26.50%6.37%5.98%11.97%
SACAX
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio
10.74%11.99%13.37%1.16%9.30%7.53%4.02%4.47%20.79%6.82%3.68%14.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


SACAX and PPVIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPVIX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to SACAX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SACAX dropped -54.31% vs PPVIX's -64.79%.

SACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SACAX and PPVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer