SACAX vs. PHTYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX).
SACAX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Jul 24, 1996. PHTYX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
SACAX vs. PHTYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SACAX vs. PHTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | -3.93% | 16.56% | 24.20% | 21.42% | -19.06% | 19.34% | 15.11% | 26.87% | -9.13% | 21.68% |
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund | -4.03% | 18.54% | 16.13% | 19.35% | -18.26% | 18.37% | 15.78% | 24.79% | -9.07% | 19.81% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SACAX having a -3.93% return and PHTYX slightly lower at -4.03%. Over the past 10 years, SACAX has outperformed PHTYX with an annualized return of 10.78%, while PHTYX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.
SACAX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
PHTYX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -4.03%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SACAX vs. PHTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SACAX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PHTYX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SACAX vs. PHTYX — Risk / Return Rank
SACAX
PHTYX
SACAX vs. PHTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SACAX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.56 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 6.22 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SACAX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.62 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between SACAX and PHTYX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SACAX vs. PHTYX - Dividend Comparison
SACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than PHTYX's 5.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACAX Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio | 12.48% | 11.99% | 13.37% | 1.16% | 9.30% | 7.53% | 4.02% | 4.47% | 20.79% | 6.82% | 3.68% | 14.08% |
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund | 5.14% | 4.94% | 4.41% | 3.05% | 9.68% | 4.72% | 3.45% | 3.63% | 4.66% | 2.24% | 2.00% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
SACAX vs. PHTYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SACAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than PHTYX's maximum drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SACAX and PHTYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SACAX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -30.61% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -11.00% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.96% | -24.94% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.90% | -30.61% | -4.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.85% | -7.95% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -4.63% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.19% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SACAX vs. PHTYX - Volatility Comparison
Principal SAM Strategic Growth Portfolio (SACAX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) at 4.60%. This indicates that SACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHTYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SACAX | PHTYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 4.60% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 8.23% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 14.73% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 14.48% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 14.75% | +1.23% |