SABPX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Strategic Asset Management Balanced Portfolio (SABPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
SABPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 24, 1996. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
SABPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SABPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SABPX Principal Strategic Asset Management Balanced Portfolio | -2.85% | 13.62% | 18.04% | 15.64% | -16.48% | 13.14% | 10.83% | 19.57% | -5.44% | 14.65% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SABPX having a -2.85% return and FASGX slightly lower at -2.99%. Over the past 10 years, SABPX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
SABPX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- 1Y
- 10.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SABPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SABPX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SABPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
SABPX
FASGX
SABPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Strategic Asset Management Balanced Portfolio (SABPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SABPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.73 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.55 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 6.89 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SABPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.70 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between SABPX and FASGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SABPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
SABPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SABPX Principal Strategic Asset Management Balanced Portfolio | 10.84% | 10.71% | 11.81% | 1.64% | 8.16% | 9.60% | 3.13% | 4.05% | 9.79% | 6.97% | 3.58% | 8.20% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
SABPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SABPX drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABPX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SABPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -47.35% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -9.07% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.41% | -23.54% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.29% | -27.20% | +1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -7.95% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -6.74% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 2.04% | -0.31% |
Volatility
SABPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Strategic Asset Management Balanced Portfolio (SABPX) is 3.63%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that SABPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SABPX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.57% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | 7.78% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 12.82% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.82% | 12.14% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 12.56% | -1.86% |