PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SABA vs. DFSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SABA vs. DFSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SABA achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than DFSHX's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SABA has outperformed DFSHX with an annualized return of 3.16%, while DFSHX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.14% annualized return.


SABA

1D
0.58%
1M
2.11%
YTD
8.33%
6M
5.02%
1Y
9.26%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
3.16%

DFSHX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SABA vs. DFSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
8.33%-0.31%31.32%-2.77%-9.02%1.05%-6.63%8.55%-1.25%4.13%
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.62%4.84%5.66%5.55%-6.24%-0.82%2.33%4.82%1.83%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SABA and DFSHX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.15

The correlation between SABA and DFSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (10 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SABA vs. DFSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SABA
SABA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABA Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSHX
DFSHX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DFSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SABA vs. DFSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SABADFSHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

2.90

-2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

4.58

-3.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.81

-0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

3.44

-2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.60

14.63

-13.02

SABA vs. DFSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SABA Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the DFSHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SABA and DFSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SABADFSHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.90

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.60

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.81

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.49

-0.06

Drawdowns

SABA vs. DFSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SABA drawdown since its inception was -32.37%, which is greater than DFSHX's maximum drawdown of -9.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABA and DFSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SABADFSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.37%

-9.58%

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-1.28%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-4.18%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

-9.58%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

-9.58%

-21.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.11%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-2.29%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

0.30%

+5.01%

Volatility

SABA vs. DFSHX - Volatility Comparison

Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) at 0.70%. This indicates that SABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SABADFSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

0.70%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

1.36%

+6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

1.52%

+10.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

3.37%

+11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

2.65%

+14.01%

Dividends

SABA vs. DFSHX - Dividend Comparison

SABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than DFSHX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.19%4.26%4.50%3.90%0.04%1.77%0.03%2.52%3.23%1.75%1.63%1.11%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
9.22%9.65%8.32%11.43%9.14%7.19%4.00%6.68%5.81%4.44%4.63%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


SABA and DFSHX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SABA has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to DFSHX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SABA dropped -32.37% vs DFSHX's -9.58%.

DFSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SABA and DFSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer