SABA vs. DGFFX
SABA (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II) and DGFFX (Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SABA returned 3.12%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for DGFFX. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SABA vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SABA achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than DGFFX's 2.91% return.
SABA
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- -1.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.45%
DGFFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $264.60K | $425.07K | $423.68K |
SABA vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | 4.89% | -0.31% | 31.32% | -2.77% | -9.02% | 1.05% | -6.63% | 8.55% | -1.25% | 1.19% |
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund | 2.91% | 5.84% | 8.04% | 7.82% | -6.09% | 4.91% | 3.59% | 6.64% | -0.35% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SABA and DGFFX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SABA vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank
SABA
DGFFX
SABA vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SABA | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.78 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 5.65 | -5.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 25.57 | -26.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SABA vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SABA drawdown since its inception was -32.37%, which is greater than DGFFX's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABA and DGFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SABA | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.37% | -12.69% | -19.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -1.19% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -3.38% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.76% | -8.17% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -0.21% | -3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -1.30% | -6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 0.24% | +5.33% |
Volatility
SABA vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) at 0.44%. This indicates that SABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SABA | DGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 0.44% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 1.50% | +7.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 2.02% | +9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 2.43% | +12.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 2.59% | +14.05% |
Dividends
SABA vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison
SABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than DGFFX's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund | 6.83% | 5.52% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 3.37% | 4.14% | 4.22% | 4.18% | 3.79% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | 9.66% | 9.65% | 8.32% | 11.43% | 9.14% | 7.19% | 4.00% | 6.68% | 5.81% | 4.44% | 4.63% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SABA and DGFFX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SABA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to DGFFX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SABA dropped -32.37% vs DGFFX's -12.69%.
DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SABA and DGFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer