SABA vs. DFGFX
SABA (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II) and DFGFX (DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, SABA returned 2.87%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for DFGFX. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SABA vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SABA achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than DFGFX's 2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SABA has outperformed DFGFX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while DFGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.86% annualized return.
SABA
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- -1.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.45%
DFGFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $264.60K | $425.07K | $423.68K |
SABA vs. DFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | 4.89% | -0.31% | 31.32% | -2.77% | -9.02% | 1.05% | -6.63% | 8.55% | -1.25% | 4.13% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 2.15% | 2.89% | 5.36% | 4.95% | -2.62% | -0.37% | 0.88% | 2.87% | 1.91% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SABA and DFGFX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SABA vs. DFGFX — Risk / Return Rank
SABA
DFGFX
SABA vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SABA | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 5.16 | -4.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 19.38 | -19.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 133.79 | -134.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SABA vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SABA drawdown since its inception was -32.37%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABA and DFGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SABA | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.37% | -4.00% | -28.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -0.20% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -2.12% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.76% | -4.00% | -15.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.39% | -4.00% | -27.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | 0.00% | -4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -0.23% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 0.03% | +5.54% |
Volatility
SABA vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.29%. This indicates that SABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SABA | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 0.29% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 0.59% | +8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 0.73% | +10.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 1.82% | +12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 1.35% | +15.29% |
Dividends
SABA vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison
SABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than DFGFX's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.16% | 2.67% | 4.77% | 3.19% | 1.17% | 0.23% | 0.57% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 1.54% | 0.65% | 0.02% |
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | 9.66% | 9.65% | 8.32% | 11.43% | 9.14% | 7.19% | 4.00% | 6.68% | 5.81% | 4.44% | 4.63% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SABA and DFGFX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SABA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to DFGFX (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SABA dropped -32.37% vs DFGFX's -4.00%.
DFGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.49 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SABA and DFGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer