PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSHX vs. TGGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, DFSHX has outperformed TGGBX with an annualized return of 2.13%, while TGGBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.03% annualized return.


DFSHX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.67%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
2.13%

TGGBX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
0.46%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
-1.51%
10Y*
1.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.52%4.84%5.66%5.55%-6.24%-0.82%2.33%4.82%1.83%2.61%
TGGBX
TCW Global Bond Fund
-0.00%10.17%-2.27%7.01%-17.09%-4.71%12.29%8.36%-1.75%6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSHX and TGGBX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.52

The correlation between DFSHX and TGGBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSHX vs. TGGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSHX
DFSHX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DFSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TGGBX
TGGBX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TGGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TGGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSHXTGGBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.83

0.62

+2.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.46

0.96

+3.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.11

+0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

0.80

+2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.57

2.26

+12.31

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the TGGBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSHX and TGGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSHXTGGBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

0.62

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

-0.22

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.18

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.29

+0.20

Drawdowns

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSHX drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum TGGBX drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSHX and TGGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSHXTGGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-27.37%

+17.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-4.16%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.18%

-8.55%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.58%

-26.20%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.58%

-27.37%

+17.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-9.15%

+8.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-6.47%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.47%

-1.17%

Volatility

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) is 0.69%, while TCW Global Bond Fund (TGGBX) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that DFSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSHXTGGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

1.84%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

4.04%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52%

5.22%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.37%

6.80%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.65%

5.80%

-3.15%

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSHX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than TGGBX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSHX vs. TGGBX - Dividend Comparison

DFSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, which matches TGGBX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.19%4.26%4.50%3.90%0.04%1.77%0.03%2.52%3.23%1.75%1.63%1.11%
TGGBX
TCW Global Bond Fund
4.17%4.12%2.99%3.65%1.97%1.93%3.70%4.18%0.50%1.88%2.91%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSHX and TGGBX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGGBX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to DFSHX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSHX dropped -9.58% vs TGGBX's -27.37%.

DFSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSHX and TGGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer