PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SABA vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SABA vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SABA achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than BRW's 3.52% return.


SABA

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.14%
6M
2.54%
YTD
4.51%
1Y
-0.96%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
2.71%

BRW

1D
0.76%
1M
2.67%
6M
3.59%
YTD
3.52%
1Y
-4.66%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SABA vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
4.51%-0.31%31.32%-2.77%-9.02%0.43%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
3.52%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SABA and BRW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SABA vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SABA
SABA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SABA vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SABABRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.95

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

-0.26

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

-0.45

+0.27

SABA vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SABA Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SABA and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SABA vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SABA drawdown since its inception was -32.37%, which is greater than BRW's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABA and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SABABRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.37%

-17.74%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-17.74%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-17.74%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.76%

-17.74%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-8.78%

+4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-4.05%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

10.41%

-4.90%

Volatility

SABA vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) is 2.88%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that SABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SABABRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.36%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

8.38%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

13.45%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

12.97%

+1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

12.87%

+3.76%

Dividends

SABA vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

SABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, less than BRW's 15.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.34%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
9.70%9.65%8.32%11.43%9.14%7.19%4.00%6.68%5.81%4.44%4.63%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


SABA and BRW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to SABA (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SABA dropped -32.37% vs BRW's -17.74%.

SABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SABA and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer