PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFGFX vs. DFAW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFGFX and DFAW is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

DFGFX vs. DFAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.38%
3.68%
DFGFX
DFAW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFGFX:

8.14

DFAW:

1.37

Sortino Ratio

DFGFX:

258.38

DFAW:

1.88

Omega Ratio

DFGFX:

259.38

DFAW:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

DFGFX:

264.96

DFAW:

2.07

Martin Ratio

DFGFX:

4,206.12

DFAW:

7.39

Ulcer Index

DFGFX:

0.00%

DFAW:

2.22%

Daily Std Dev

DFGFX:

0.64%

DFAW:

12.02%

Max Drawdown

DFGFX:

-4.00%

DFAW:

-7.94%

Current Drawdown

DFGFX:

0.00%

DFAW:

-2.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGFX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than DFAW's 2.73% return.


DFGFX

YTD

0.62%

1M

0.31%

6M

2.38%

1Y

5.14%

5Y*

1.66%

10Y*

1.54%

DFAW

YTD

2.73%

1M

-0.42%

6M

3.68%

1Y

14.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFGFX vs. DFAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGFX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAW's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for DFAW: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for DFGFX: current value at 0.16% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.16%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFGFX vs. DFAW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFAW is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFAW is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFAW is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFAW is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFAW is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFAW is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFGFX vs. DFAW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFGFX, currently valued at 8.14, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.008.141.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFGFX, currently valued at 258.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00258.381.88
The chart of Omega ratio for DFGFX, currently valued at 259.38, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.00259.381.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFGFX, currently valued at 264.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00264.962.07
The chart of Martin ratio for DFGFX, currently valued at 4206.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004,206.127.39
DFGFX
DFAW

The current DFGFX Sharpe Ratio is 8.14, which is higher than the DFAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGFX and DFAW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.00Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16
8.14
1.37
DFGFX
DFAW

Dividends

DFGFX vs. DFAW - Dividend Comparison

DFGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than DFAW's 1.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.74%4.77%3.19%1.17%0.23%0.57%2.23%2.20%1.54%0.85%0.02%1.50%
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
1.43%1.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFGFX vs. DFAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGFX drawdown since its inception was -4.00%, smaller than the maximum DFAW drawdown of -7.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGFX and DFAW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-2.03%
DFGFX
DFAW

Volatility

DFGFX vs. DFAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) is 0.17%, while Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that DFGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.17%
3.26%
DFGFX
DFAW
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab