BRW vs. PFL
BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) and PFL (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BRW returned 7.19%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for PFL. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BRW vs. PFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRW achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than PFL's -1.73% return.
BRW
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- -8.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.02%
PFL
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26M | $1.37M | $1.47M | |
| $1.23M | $2.37M | $1.78M |
BRW vs. PFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.06% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.64% | 3.19% |
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | -1.73% | 13.03% | 11.51% | 17.29% | -17.92% | -6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRW and PFL is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRW vs. PFL — Risk / Return Rank
BRW
PFL
BRW vs. PFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRW | PFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 0.42 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 1.13 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRW vs. PFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRW drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum PFL drawdown of -77.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRW and PFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRW | PFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -77.97% | +60.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.74% | -7.64% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.74% | -12.89% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -33.30% | +15.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -3.61% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -10.95% | +6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.60% | 2.86% | +7.74% |
Volatility
BRW vs. PFL - Volatility Comparison
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to PIMCO Income Strategy Fund (PFL) at 2.24%. This indicates that BRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRW | PFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 2.24% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.85% | 8.45% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 9.55% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 13.60% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 18.32% | -5.42% |
Dividends
BRW vs. PFL - Dividend Comparison
BRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.41%, more than PFL's 12.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 15.41% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFL PIMCO Income Strategy Fund | 12.65% | 11.59% | 11.66% | 11.57% | 12.04% | 9.53% | 9.44% | 9.11% | 9.94% | 9.25% | 10.22% | 11.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRW and PFL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to PFL (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRW dropped -17.74% vs PFL's -77.97%.
PFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRW and PFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer