SAA vs. UCC
SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%) while UCC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SAA returned 12.47%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for UCC. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SAA vs. UCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 37.82% return, which is significantly higher than UCC's -8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has underperformed UCC with an annualized return of 12.47%, while UCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
SAA
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 37.82%
- 6M
- 30.48%
- 1Y
- 65.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
UCC
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -8.62%
- 6M
- -10.29%
- 1Y
- 10.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
SAA vs. UCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 37.82% | 0.29% | 5.60% | 21.32% | -36.17% | 51.77% | -1.79% | 42.39% | -23.00% | 23.94% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -8.62% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -57.59% | 20.92% | 46.55% | 53.76% | -4.94% | 42.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and UCC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SAA and UCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAA vs. UCC — Risk / Return Rank
SAA
UCC
SAA vs. UCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAA | UCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.08 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 0.35 | +3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.75 | 0.97 | +10.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAA vs. UCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than UCC's maximum drawdown of -83.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and UCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAA | UCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -83.05% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -29.14% | +10.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.84% | -48.01% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | -61.77% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.54% | -61.77% | -12.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.41% | +18.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -21.80% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 10.45% | -4.85% |
Volatility
SAA vs. UCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) is 9.77%, while ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that SAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAA | UCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 12.41% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.21% | 27.05% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.26% | 36.41% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.58% | 43.70% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 40.68% | +5.47% |
SAA vs. UCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SAA and UCC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SAA vs. UCC - Dividend Comparison
SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than UCC's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.73% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAA and UCC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCC has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to SAA (9.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs UCC's -83.05%.
On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 13.99% vs 12.47% for SAA. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 9.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SAA and UCC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.73% for SAA.
SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%).
SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAA and UCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer