PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAA vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.62%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.


SAA

1D
1.62%
1M
2.29%
YTD
30.42%
6M
31.77%
1Y
66.46%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
11.62%

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
30.42%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%51.77%-1.79%42.39%-23.00%23.94%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SAA and QQQ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2007

0.68

The correlation between SAA and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SAA vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SAA
QQQ

Financial Services

16.9%
0.2%

Industrials

15.5%
2.8%

Technology

15.5%
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
12.3%

Healthcare

11.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

7.7%
0.1%

Energy

5.9%
0.6%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
7.7%

Utilities

2.0%
1.4%

Financial Services

SAA
16.9%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

SAA
15.5%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

SAA
15.5%
QQQ
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SAA
13.4%
QQQ
12.3%

Healthcare

SAA
11.0%
QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

SAA
7.7%
QQQ
0.1%

Energy

SAA
5.9%
QQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

SAA
5.1%
QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

SAA
3.6%
QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

SAA
3.5%
QQQ
7.7%

Utilities

SAA
2.0%
QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAAQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

2.73

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

3.55

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.71

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.46

14.30

-2.84

SAA vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAA and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAAQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.73

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.83

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.99

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.41

-0.23

Drawdowns

SAA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAAQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.39%

-82.97%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.21%

-11.96%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.84%

-22.77%

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-35.12%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.54%

-35.12%

-39.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

0.00%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-32.79%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

3.11%

+2.52%

Volatility

SAA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that SAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAAQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.75%

4.48%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.86%

12.11%

+11.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.90%

15.95%

+19.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.53%

22.39%

+21.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.13%

22.30%

+23.83%

SAA vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.77%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAA and QQQ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAA has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.97% vs 11.62% for SAA. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SAA.

SAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

SAA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAA and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer