SAA vs. CURE
SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) and CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SAA tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%) while CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SAA returned 12.47%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for CURE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAA charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for CURE.
Performance
SAA vs. CURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAA achieves a 37.82% return, which is significantly higher than CURE's -7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SAA has underperformed CURE with an annualized return of 12.47%, while CURE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.
SAA
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 37.82%
- 6M
- 30.48%
- 1Y
- 65.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
CURE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- -7.96%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
SAA vs. CURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 37.82% | 0.29% | 5.60% | 21.32% | -36.17% | 51.77% | -1.79% | 42.39% | -23.00% | 23.94% |
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -7.96% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | -20.51% | 88.30% | 5.02% | 55.66% | 2.82% | 69.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAA and CURE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SAA and CURE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
SAA vs. CURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SAA
CURE
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SAA
CURE
-
Industrials
SAA
CURE
-
Technology
SAA
CURE
-
Consumer Cyclical
SAA
CURE
-
Healthcare
SAA
CURE
Real Estate
SAA
CURE
-
Energy
SAA
CURE
-
Basic Materials
SAA
CURE
-
Communication Services
SAA
CURE
-
Consumer Defensive
SAA
CURE
-
Utilities
SAA
CURE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAA vs. CURE — Risk / Return Rank
SAA
CURE
SAA vs. CURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) and Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAA | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.13 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 0.85 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.75 | 1.94 | +9.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAA vs. CURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAA drawdown since its inception was -87.39%, which is greater than CURE's maximum drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAA and CURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAA | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.39% | -69.19% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -31.10% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.84% | -51.93% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | -52.23% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.54% | -69.19% | -5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.94% | +26.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -18.16% | -9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 13.71% | -8.11% |
Volatility
SAA vs. CURE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) is 9.77%, while Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a volatility of 14.30%. This indicates that SAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAA | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 14.30% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.21% | 30.87% | -6.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.26% | 44.32% | -8.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.58% | 43.84% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 49.59% | -3.44% |
SAA vs. CURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CURE's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAA vs. CURE - Dividend Comparison
SAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than CURE's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.16% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.73% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAA and CURE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CURE has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to SAA (9.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAA dropped -87.39% vs CURE's -69.19%.
On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 13.49% vs 12.47% for SAA. On fees, SAA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 9.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 13.49% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SAA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.
CURE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.73% for SAA.
SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%), while CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SAA and 1.08% for CURE.
SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAA and CURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer