S7XP.L vs. RING

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

S7XP.L (Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - S7XP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L returned 15.50%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for RING. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. S7XP.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.

Performance

S7XP.L vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

S7XP.L is traded in GBp, while RING is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RING values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S7XP.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than RING's 2.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with S7XP.L having a 15.50% annualized return and RING not far ahead at 15.55%.

S7XP.L

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 6.44%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 6M: 10.76%
• 1Y: 41.95%
• 3Y*: 44.34%
• 5Y*: 28.16%
• 10Y*: 15.50%

RING

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 7.47%
• 1Y: 71.54%
• 3Y*: 43.91%
• 5Y*: 21.61%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S7XP.L vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
S7XP.L Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF	4.29%	94.76%	25.39%	26.22%	6.71%	30.03%	-18.68%	10.65%	-30.92%	19.01%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	2.29%	145.86%	18.00%	6.68%	-5.34%	-6.59%	21.31%	44.21%	-7.99%	0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between S7XP.L and RING is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2014	0.01

Over the past year, S7XP.L and RING have become more correlated (0.22) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

S7XP.L vs. RING - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	S7XP.L	RING
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

S7XP.L vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S7XP.L

S7XP.L Risk / Return Rank: 50
S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
S7XP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
S7XP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
S7XP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
S7XP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 42
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S7XP.L vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	S7XP.L	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.63	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.00	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.43	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.05	6.29	+1.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

S7XP.L vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S7XP.L and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	S7XP.L	RING	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.63	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	0.65	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.45	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.14	+0.22

Drawdowns

S7XP.L vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S7XP.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -78.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S7XP.L and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	S7XP.L	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.98%	-78.95%	+15.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.10%	-29.53%	+12.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.26%	-29.53%	+11.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.01%	-38.88%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.98%	-47.31%	-15.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-24.34%	+22.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-40.46%	+21.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.20%	11.41%	-6.21%

Volatility

S7XP.L vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) is 6.49%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 14.10%. This indicates that S7XP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	S7XP.L	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	14.10%	-7.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.61%	35.47%	-16.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.31%	44.02%	-20.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.83%	33.60%	-7.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.92%	34.90%	-6.98%

S7XP.L vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

S7XP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

S7XP.L vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

S7XP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.82%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%
S7XP.L Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both S7XP.L and RING in my portfolio?

S7XP.L and RING have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, S7XP.L or RING?

On fees, S7XP.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, S7XP.L or RING?

S7XP.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RING.

What is the main difference between S7XP.L and RING?

S7XP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while RING is Gold. S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for S7XP.L and 0.39% for RING.