PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S100.L vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S100.L vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

S100.L is traded in GBp, while VUG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VUG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S100.L achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, S100.L has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 8.88%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.14% annualized return.


S100.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.64%
YTD
5.86%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
8.88%

VUG

1D
0.26%
1M
6.72%
YTD
10.22%
6M
8.24%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
19.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S100.L vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S100.L
Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.86%25.76%9.34%7.33%4.91%17.58%-11.72%17.44%-9.33%12.12%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
10.22%10.90%35.01%39.49%-25.21%28.55%36.13%31.82%2.41%16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between S100.L and VUG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009

0.31

The correlation between S100.L and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

S100.L vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
S100.L
VUG

Financial Services

24.5%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

13.9%
1.5%

Industrials

13.7%
3.6%

Healthcare

13.6%
4.6%

Energy

11.7%
0.4%

Basic Materials

8.5%
0.6%

Utilities

5.3%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
12.2%

Communication Services

2.6%
17.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.0%

Technology

0.8%
53.5%

Financial Services

S100.L
24.5%
VUG
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

S100.L
13.9%
VUG
1.5%

Industrials

S100.L
13.7%
VUG
3.6%

Healthcare

S100.L
13.6%
VUG
4.6%

Energy

S100.L
11.7%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

S100.L
8.5%
VUG
0.6%

Utilities

S100.L
5.3%
VUG
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

S100.L
4.7%
VUG
12.2%

Communication Services

S100.L
2.6%
VUG
17.3%

Real Estate

S100.L
0.9%
VUG
1.0%

Technology

S100.L
0.8%
VUG
53.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S100.L vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S100.L
S100.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
S100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
S100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
S100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
S100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S100.L vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S100.LVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.76

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

5.16

+2.85

S100.L vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S100.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S100.L and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S100.LVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.90

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.79

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.90

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.75

-0.18

Drawdowns

S100.L vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S100.L drawdown since its inception was -34.58%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S100.L and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S100.LVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.58%

-31.19%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-16.48%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-25.69%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.04%

-28.61%

+15.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-28.61%

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

-0.97%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-5.65%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.63%

-2.98%

Volatility

S100.L vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.63%. This indicates that S100.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S100.LVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.63%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

11.08%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

15.34%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

20.94%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

21.31%

-6.22%

S100.L vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

S100.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

S100.L vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

S100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
S100.L
Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


S100.L and VUG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for S100.L.

S100.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. S100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for S100.L and 0.03% for VUG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S100.L and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer