RZV vs. XLP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RZV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RZV returned 10.83%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for XLP. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RZV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.

Performance

RZV vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 28.27% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RZV has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 10.83%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.35% annualized return.

RZV

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: 16.91%
• YTD: 28.27%
• 1Y: 48.09%
• 3Y*: 16.77%
• 5Y*: 12.95%
• 10Y*: 10.83%
• ALL TIME*: 8.35%

XLP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: 1.69%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 7.24%
• 5Y*: 6.52%
• 10Y*: 7.35%
• ALL TIME*: 6.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF	$1.90M	$1.80M	$1.00M
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.06B	$972.52M	$1.01B

RZV vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF	28.27%	8.65%	5.06%	22.97%	-6.80%	45.95%	-3.88%	22.29%	-19.66%	1.25%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	10.62%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RZV and XLP is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between RZV and XLP has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RZV vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RZV	XLP
Consumer Cyclical	23.9%	1.9%
Industrials	15.7%	-
Technology	12.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.4%	98.1%
Healthcare	8.8%	-
Financial Services	7.7%	-
Energy	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	5.7%	-
Real Estate	4.6%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Utilities	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

RZV vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RZV

RZV Risk / Return Rank: 89
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 25
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RZV vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RZV	XLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.63	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	1.00	+2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.11	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	0.91	+2.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.98	1.65	+11.33

RZV vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZV Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZV and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RZV vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and XLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RZV	XLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.11%	-35.90%	-41.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.56%	-9.69%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.81%	-11.42%	-18.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.81%	-16.30%	-13.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.42%	-24.51%	-35.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-4.53%	+3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.50%	-7.05%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	5.33%	-1.62%

Volatility

RZV vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) is 5.09%, while State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that RZV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RZV	XLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.74%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.81%	11.49%	+2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.11%	14.15%	+5.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.09%	13.61%	+10.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.89%	14.86%	+12.03%

RZV vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

RZV vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than XLP's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF	1.37%	1.59%	1.14%	1.13%	1.43%	0.86%	0.63%	1.03%	2.03%	1.02%	0.46%	1.24%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.59%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RZV and XLP in my portfolio?

RZV and XLP have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RZV or XLP?

XLP has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to RZV (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs XLP's -35.90%.

Which ETF is better, RZV or XLP?

On 10-year performance, RZV leads with 10.83% vs 7.35% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RZV has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RZV or XLP?

Over the 10-year period, RZV has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RZV or XLP?

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RZV or XLP?

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.37% for RZV.

What is the main difference between RZV and XLP?

RZV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.08% for XLP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.