PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZV vs. VIOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RZV vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly higher than VIOV's 15.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RZV having a 10.65% annualized return and VIOV not far behind at 10.23%.


RZV

1D
-1.04%
1M
3.13%
YTD
17.78%
6M
15.59%
1Y
42.30%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
10.65%

VIOV

1D
-1.28%
1M
2.26%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.76%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZV vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
17.78%8.65%5.06%22.97%-6.80%45.95%-3.88%22.29%-19.66%1.25%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
15.28%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RZV and VIOV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.91

The correlation between RZV and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

RZV vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RZV
VIOV

Consumer Cyclical

26.1%
15.4%

Industrials

15.7%
12.7%

Energy

9.7%
9.1%

Technology

8.9%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.8%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
3.8%

Financial Services

7.3%
19.8%

Basic Materials

6.4%
6.3%

Real Estate

5.0%
8.8%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.4%

Utilities

0.4%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RZV
26.1%
VIOV
15.4%

Industrials

RZV
15.7%
VIOV
12.7%

Energy

RZV
9.7%
VIOV
9.1%

Technology

RZV
8.9%
VIOV
10.6%

Healthcare

RZV
8.8%
VIOV
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

RZV
7.7%
VIOV
3.8%

Financial Services

RZV
7.3%
VIOV
19.8%

Basic Materials

RZV
6.4%
VIOV
6.3%

Real Estate

RZV
5.0%
VIOV
8.8%

Communication Services

RZV
4.2%
VIOV
3.4%

Utilities

RZV
0.4%
VIOV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZV vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZV vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RZVVIOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.99

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

13.00

-1.99

RZV vs. VIOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VIOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZV and VIOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RZVVIOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.03

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.26

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.43

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.53

-0.26

Drawdowns

RZV vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than VIOV's maximum drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and VIOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZVVIOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-47.36%

-29.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-9.33%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-28.44%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-28.44%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

-47.36%

-13.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.28%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-7.38%

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.86%

+0.99%

Volatility

RZV vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) at 4.54%. This indicates that RZV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZVVIOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.54%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

11.57%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

18.41%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.37%

21.95%

+2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.04%

23.89%

+3.15%

RZV vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RZV vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison

RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than VIOV's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.35%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.59%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RZV and VIOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RZV has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to VIOV (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs VIOV's -47.36%.

On 10-year performance, RZV leads with 10.65% vs 10.23% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RZV has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.

VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.35% for RZV.

RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.10% for VIOV.

RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZV and VIOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer