RZV vs. TSCV
RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. RZV is passively managed, while TSCV is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RZV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.
Performance
RZV vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RZV having a 21.03% return and TSCV slightly lower at 20.01%.
RZV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 21.03%
- 6M
- 20.88%
- 1Y
- 41.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
TSCV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RZV vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 21.03% | 3.20% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 20.01% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between RZV and TSCV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RZV vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank
RZV
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RZV vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RZV | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RZV vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than TSCV's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and TSCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZV | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.11% | -10.17% | -66.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -0.82% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.57% | -1.95% | -11.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | — | — |
Volatility
RZV vs. TSCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RZV | TSCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 16.72% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 16.72% | +7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 16.72% | +10.27% |
RZV vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RZV vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison
RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than TSCV's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 0.86% | 0.63% | 1.03% | 2.03% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 1.24% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.24% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RZV and TSCV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RZV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RZV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.
RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.60% for TSCV.
Find the right allocation for RZV and TSCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer