PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZV vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RZV vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZV achieves a 21.03% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RZV has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 11.15%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.


RZV

1D
-0.09%
1M
5.47%
YTD
21.03%
6M
20.88%
1Y
41.43%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
11.15%

PPA

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.55%
YTD
9.32%
6M
6.95%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
18.19%
10Y*
17.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZV vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
21.03%8.65%5.06%22.97%-6.80%45.95%-3.88%22.29%-19.66%1.25%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
9.32%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RZV and PPA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between RZV and PPA has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RZV vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RZV
PPA

Consumer Cyclical

25.9%

-

Industrials

15.9%
90.6%

Technology

10.5%
9.2%

Energy

8.8%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.6%

-

Financial Services

7.4%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.2%

-

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
0.1%

Utilities

0.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

RZV
25.9%
PPA

-

Industrials

RZV
15.9%
PPA
90.6%

Technology

RZV
10.5%
PPA
9.2%

Energy

RZV
8.8%
PPA

-

Healthcare

RZV
8.4%
PPA

-

Consumer Defensive

RZV
7.6%
PPA

-

Financial Services

RZV
7.4%
PPA
0.1%

Basic Materials

RZV
6.2%
PPA

-

Real Estate

RZV
4.8%
PPA

-

Communication Services

RZV
4.0%
PPA
0.1%

Utilities

RZV
0.4%
PPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZV vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZV vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RZVPPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.90

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

5.24

+5.52

RZV vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZV Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZV and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RZV vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZV drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZV and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZVPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-57.37%

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-13.71%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-15.24%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-18.37%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

-43.92%

-16.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-7.74%

+5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-9.18%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

4.95%

-1.09%

Volatility

RZV vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) is 5.25%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that RZV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZVPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

8.30%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

16.96%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

20.14%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.32%

18.70%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.99%

20.73%

+6.26%

RZV vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

RZV vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

RZV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than PPA's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.37%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.45%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


RZV and PPA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to RZV (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZV dropped -77.11% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.74% vs 11.15% for RZV. On fees, RZV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RZV has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RZV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.37% for PPA.

RZV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZV and 0.58% for PPA.

RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZV and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer