PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYWCX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYWCX achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly higher than RYGRX's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RYWCX has underperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.


RYWCX

1D
2.25%
1M
-3.49%
6M
19.44%
YTD
25.73%
1Y
34.86%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
7.33%
ALL TIME*
6.75%

RYGRX

1D
5.27%
1M
-6.70%
6M
13.58%
YTD
18.58%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
11.74%
ALL TIME*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
25.73%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
18.58%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RYWCX and RYGRX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.85

The correlation between RYWCX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYWCX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYWCXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.13

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

0.96

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

4.03

+7.57

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYWCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYWCX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYWCX drawdown since its inception was -60.64%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYWCX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYWCXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.64%

-54.22%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-17.01%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-24.95%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.28%

-36.57%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.65%

-36.63%

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-12.64%

+7.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-9.38%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

4.08%

-1.32%

Volatility

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) is 5.65%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that RYWCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYWCXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

10.93%

-5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

22.15%

-7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

24.88%

-5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.92%

24.47%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

23.34%

+1.38%

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RYWCX and RYGRX have an expense ratio of 2.26%.


Dividends

RYWCX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
4.29%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYWCX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to RYWCX (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYWCX dropped -60.64% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

RYWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYWCX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer