RYGRX vs. XYLD

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 5.62%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.31% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RYGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%.

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.90%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and XYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.35%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.