PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYGRX vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 29.00% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 13.07%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.


RYGRX

1D
-1.00%
1M
5.68%
YTD
29.00%
6M
28.70%
1Y
37.14%
3Y*
25.38%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
13.07%

XYLD

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.75%
YTD
4.18%
6M
5.51%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
10.92%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
8.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
29.00%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.18%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and XYLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.74

The correlation between RYGRX and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYGRXXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.61

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.23

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

17.19

-4.48

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYGRXXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.59

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.68

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.57

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.60

-0.16

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYGRXXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-33.46%

-20.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-5.29%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

-15.53%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-18.66%

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

-33.46%

-3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.91%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-3.72%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

0.99%

+1.92%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.31%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYGRXXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

1.31%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

5.46%

+10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

6.62%

+13.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

11.22%

+12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.87%

14.21%

+8.66%

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYGRX vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than XYLD's 10.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
3.95%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.60%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYGRX and XYLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to XYLD (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYGRX and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer