PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYGRX vs. PRGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYGRX achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly higher than PRGFX's 4.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RYGRX has underperformed PRGFX with an annualized return of 12.33%, while PRGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.30% annualized return.


RYGRX

1D
3.41%
1M
-2.52%
6M
23.03%
YTD
25.24%
1Y
24.31%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
12.33%
ALL TIME*
9.43%

PRGFX

1D
2.47%
1M
1.18%
6M
9.62%
YTD
4.07%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
15.30%
ALL TIME*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
25.24%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%
PRGFX
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund
4.07%15.64%38.36%45.33%-40.12%19.86%36.92%30.83%-1.04%33.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RYGRX and PRGFX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.90

The correlation between RYGRX and PRGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYGRX vs. PRGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGFX
PRGFX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PRGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYGRXPRGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.61

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

1.80

+3.87

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYGRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the PRGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYGRX and PRGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, roughly equal to the maximum PRGFX drawdown of -54.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYGRX and PRGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYGRXPRGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-54.01%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

-18.02%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

-22.69%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-46.44%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

-46.44%

+9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.73%

-3.14%

-4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-10.65%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

6.11%

-1.89%

Volatility

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) at 6.69%. This indicates that RYGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYGRXPRGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.97%

6.69%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

14.48%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

17.90%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

23.37%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

22.21%

+1.16%

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYGRX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PRGFX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYGRX vs. PRGFX - Dividend Comparison

RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than PRGFX's 13.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGFX
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund
13.05%13.58%13.26%3.34%3.55%9.34%3.51%1.81%9.09%13.57%2.22%7.23%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
4.06%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYGRX and PRGFX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to PRGFX (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYGRX dropped -54.22% vs PRGFX's -54.01%.

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYGRX and PRGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer