PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYRUX vs. RMQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYRUX achieves a 34.42% return, which is significantly higher than RMQHX's 16.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RYRUX has underperformed RMQHX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while RMQHX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.68% annualized return.


RYRUX

1D
2.71%
1M
-3.87%
6M
21.97%
YTD
34.42%
1Y
70.85%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
10.46%
ALL TIME*
7.55%

RMQHX

1D
7.48%
1M
-8.91%
6M
13.97%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
39.44%
3Y*
35.26%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
33.68%
ALL TIME*
31.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYRUX
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund
34.42%12.62%10.94%22.65%-43.88%20.72%16.41%47.20%-26.63%25.55%
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
16.20%33.90%44.74%115.89%-59.96%56.33%101.06%80.70%-7.28%69.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RYRUX and RMQHX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.70

The correlation between RYRUX and RMQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYRUX vs. RMQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYRUX
RYRUX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RYRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQHX
RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYRUXRMQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.31

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

4.05

+5.22

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYRUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the RMQHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYRUX and RMQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYRUX drawdown since its inception was -88.49%, which is greater than RMQHX's maximum drawdown of -63.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYRUX and RMQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYRUXRMQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.49%

-63.21%

-25.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.39%

-24.97%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.91%

-42.46%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.41%

-63.21%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.68%

-63.21%

-8.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-17.08%

+11.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-12.81%

-18.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.58%

8.05%

-1.47%

Volatility

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX) is 7.62%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a volatility of 14.58%. This indicates that RYRUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYRUXRMQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

14.58%

-6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.24%

32.55%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.80%

39.23%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.04%

47.28%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.81%

46.84%

-0.03%

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYRUX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQHX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYRUX vs. RMQHX - Dividend Comparison

RYRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than RMQHX's 29.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
29.92%34.77%25.22%3.66%0.00%2.13%5.17%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYRUX
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund
2.74%3.68%2.93%0.35%0.00%0.20%0.00%0.27%0.00%2.57%0.00%28.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYRUX and RMQHX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMQHX has higher volatility (14.58%) compared to RYRUX (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYRUX dropped -88.49% vs RMQHX's -63.21%.

RYRUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYRUX and RMQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer