PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYRUX vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYRUX achieves a 38.55% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RYRUX has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 11.89%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.42% annualized return.


RYRUX

1D
4.13%
1M
7.19%
YTD
38.55%
6M
30.34%
1Y
84.15%
3Y*
24.72%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
11.89%

XMMO

1D
1.31%
1M
5.63%
YTD
25.95%
6M
23.04%
1Y
40.85%
3Y*
32.12%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
20.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYRUX
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund
38.55%12.62%10.94%22.65%-43.88%20.72%16.41%47.20%-26.63%25.55%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
25.95%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RYRUX and XMMO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.85

The correlation between RYRUX and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYRUX vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYRUX
RYRUX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RYRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYRUXXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.92

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

19.55

-6.84

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYRUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYRUX and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYRUX drawdown since its inception was -88.49%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYRUX and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYRUXXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.49%

-55.37%

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.39%

-8.34%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.91%

-24.93%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.41%

-27.91%

-34.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.68%

-36.74%

-34.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

0.00%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.23%

-9.43%

-21.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.58%

2.09%

+4.49%

Volatility

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund (RYRUX) has a higher volatility of 13.58% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 8.04%. This indicates that RYRUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYRUXXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.58%

8.04%

+5.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.67%

16.60%

+12.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.37%

19.82%

+19.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.29%

21.62%

+23.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.97%

22.35%

+24.62%

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYRUX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYRUX vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

RYRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than XMMO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYRUX
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund
2.65%3.68%2.93%0.35%0.00%0.20%0.00%0.27%0.00%2.57%0.00%28.79%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.74%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYRUX and XMMO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYRUX has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to XMMO (8.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYRUX dropped -88.49% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

RYRUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYRUX and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer